The Us financial watchdog, has concluded that the tokenverkoop of the Telegram is an Open Network (TON) was made illegal. This ICON has a Telegram to the 1.7-billion-dollar-collected.
Contents
No clear feedback from the SEC
TONS of features to all investors in an e-mail in which they explained that they had 18 months to provide feedback on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to get it. They would not agree with the decision of the SEC. TON writes:
“We were surprised and disappointed that the SEC chose in the lawsuit, under these circumstances, and we do not agree with the legal positions of the SEC.”
The hearing is scheduled for October 24
In the e-mail declared by Telegram that they should continue to be examined in order to resolve the situation. One of the means by which they are able and willing to use the hearing to be postponed. After that, the SEC of the initial coin offering (ICO) of the Telegram to be illegal, said the court hearing was scheduled for October 24 in New York city.
According to the news tweette Nathaniel Popper of the New York Times also the author of Digital Gold on the 12th of October to raise awareness of the involvement of large, experienced investors. Benchmark, Sequoia, and Lightspeed took also part in the ICR of 1.7 billion dollars. He said:
The SEC’s move to shut down the Telegram’s crypto-project, raises questions about the big venture-capital firms that will gift it to $1.7 billion, and convinced themselves that it would pass regulatory muster. That includes the Benchmark, Sequoia, and Lightspeed.
— Nathaniel Popper (@nathanielpopper) as of October 11, 2019
The criticism on the SEC, because of the lack of clarity cryptobeleid
The SEC is due to the cryptowereld been criticized because of the lack of clarity with respect to the cryptocurrency’s and the OIC’s. At the end of september, sent a group of lawmakers from the U.s. congress, sent a letter to Jay Clayton, chair of the SEC. They were in the SEC, called for a clear set of guidelines about the cryptocurrency’s. Rather, the Republican Members of the House of Representatives of the United States of america, and Warren Davidson, in a recent survey about cryptocurrency. The participants were able to expressed their concern about the existing legal framework for the OIC’s and the computer.
Earlier this year, to ” John Berlau, a senior, is a member of the libertarian think tank Competitive Enterprise Institute, is the approach of the SEC as to the cryptocurrency’s regulation. The point of this argument is that the restrictive rules of the transformational innovation processes. He pointed out that the scrutiny of the SEC and the functionality of the blockchain technology would be able to threaten as the bureau of cryptocurrency as securities (security programs) is considered.