The history of humanity has proven that his survival required to innovate, not with evolution biological, but with science, covering the technological development in the world, allowing the life of the people. However, this same development can cause impacts on the behavior of the people, emerging the debate if they are positive or negative, an example being the article of today, studying the braces automated. It should be noted that no reference is made to those who use programs such as Microsoft Word or the default by Google, given that they are the traditional model. In this article, we refer to that offer auto-completion of words and sentences, such as those commonly used in smart phones, based on Artificial Intelligence as the user types, which have evolved in the close time. Google, for example, announced that it would add a tool driven by artificial intelligence offers automatic detection of grammatical errors when you compose messages in Gmail, as well as the automatic correction of some common spelling errors. The company introduced a similar function-driven IA for the documents in the G Suite at the beginning of this year. While some education experts are applauding the advancement of the grammar tools of high technology as a way to help people express their thoughts with clarity, others are not so sure. Artificial intelligence, according to the contrary, is as smart as the human that programmed, and often very partial. “Language is part of their heritage and identity, and if you are using a tool that constantly says to him: ‘you Are wrong’, that is not a good thing,” said Paulo Blikstein, an associate professor of communications, media and Design of learning technology at Teachers College of Columbia University. “There is a mythical, monolithic (English) … And each time we have tried to reduce the evolution of a language, has never gone well”. The editing tools of grammar are not new, just ask the much maligned digital assistant of Microsoft, Clippy, but the technology behind them is becoming more complex. Grammarly said that it uses a hybrid approach to build their algorithms, one that combines a variety of methods of natural language processing, including machine learning, deep learning and the custom rules, among others. In a recent publication of Medium, the research scientists of Grammarly discussed the use of statistical patterns that are inherent to a language to distinguish between the language of right and wrong. The CEO of Grammarly, Brad Hoover, said he originally expected to be the product of your company is aimed at university students, and more than 1,000 educational institutions currently licensing of Grammarly for their classrooms. “Our wizard of scripture is a coach, not a crutch,” said Hoover in an email. Being this last point the dilemma of the use of this type of technology, since if the person gets used to relying on the corrections or completed that the wizard performs, it is losing the notion and the practice of the same grammar. Concluding, there arises the reflection that various people have discussed on the Internet: Do you Know grammar is obsolete by existing tools? The following two tabs change content below. I am a student of economics, interested in innovation and technological development, always faithful to that tomorrow will be a better day.
Contents